Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Matt Fraction. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Matt Fraction. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

I Know Nothing No 4:- X-Men 3

Người đăng: Unknown on Thứ Năm, 9 tháng 9, 2010

1.

I've not picked up a monthly X-Men book since the beginning of Grant Morrison's run at the end of 2001, and I was quickly off of that particular runaway train not too long afterwards. In fact, I've not been what might be called a fan, or even a semi-regular reader, since the middle of the 1983.

How is that possible?

For the X-Men were my book when I was very much younger, and Cyclops in particular my hero too, and it wasn't until I picked up Gischler and Medina's "X-Men" # 3 this very afternoon that it finally dawned on me with any real clarity why the affair should have ended in the way that I did.

2.

The X-Men was always my book, because the X-Men were losers. It was the counter-intuitive beauty of the title until it was into its third decade: the X-Men were the geeks who had learned to defend themselves, but who never could win. They were the uglier ones, the odd ones, the short ones, the fat, the shy, the bespectacled, the ones who actually liked to study and wanted praise from the teacher, the abused, the confused and the just plain objectionable. Pick any school canteen in the West and you could spot those kids who'd be the mutants on Marvel-Earth, and the mutant-haters, and the just plain ordinary folks who'd simply want the fuss over eye-beams and levitation to go away and leave them to the challenges of an ordinary life.

I know that this imaginary-mutant spotting can be done, because for 18 years or so I used to sit on duty in canteens, and school shops, and on gate duties, an unhappy man paid by the state to be Professor X and struggling by as something of Magneto, while barely making it to the social competencies of poor maligned Dr Henry Pym. I'd been Cyclops as a boy, in my boy's imagination, big thick heavy glasses and an inability to talk in anything but best-friend confidences with women, and now I was becoming as bald as Charles Xavier and as jealous of my authority as Eric Lehnsherr.

I have often wondered if it is a coincidence that my decision to become a teacher coincided, give or take a year or two, with a catastrophic fall in my interest in Marvel's mutants. Perhaps I'd joined the enemy and now I couldn't even enjoy the X-Men.

3.

It's probably no coincidence that the X-Men were initially the least commercially successful comic of all Marvel's Silver Age books. The truth was, there wasn't a great deal of wish fulfilment possible watching the original mutants. Peter Parker might be hated as Spider-Man, but at least he rather impressively managed to date Betty Brant, and she had a job. But the X-Men were simply losers, hated in costume, hated as civilians, hated by their fellow homo superior, and their chances of social integration were slim. They weren't even, with the exception of Cyclops, particularly impressive as superheroes. One had big feet. Another could fly. The young woman could turn the pages of books with her mind, though it tended to make her giddy.

Of course I loved them.

My X-Men were obviously the kids who simply couldn't collaborate with the social bear-pit that can be the teenage years. And the simple fact that they weren't able to fit in meant that they could serve as a metaphor for any situation where a vanguard of a non-conforming group was perpetually faced with a significant body of prejudice and in its turn was learning how to stand up and fight back.

The X-Men could be Malcolm X's so-smartly turned out women and men, or Martin Luther King's civil rights protesters. It didn't really matter which, for the metaphor could be stretched to incorporate both violent and non-violent wings of any political struggle, just as long as whoever the X-Men were supposed to be representing were demonstratively lacking social power and, to a greater or lesser degree, facing the inequities of persecution.

But somewhere in the middle of the 1980s, the X-Men went from being the thin X-gened line to becoming something of an army, and then a host of armies, and by the Nineties only an idiot could convincingly perceive them to be in any fashion powerless anymore. There were hundreds of them, and then yet more hundreds, and they could take out just about any other superperson force on the planet with a rotating team-membership just to keep things interesting for themselves.


These X-Men weren't victims anymore. They were players. They were insiders. They were deal-makers and breakers in the superhero firmament. Few ends of the world could possibly be averted without their presence. And the metaphor, already stretched and twisted by over-use and mis-use, started to work in unexpected and counter-productive ways. For no longer was it possible to simply pretend that the X-Men were a helpless little para-military barely able to keep their own backyard secure from this month's mutant baddie, given how very powerful an institution they'd become. Now audiences had to be thrilled with the very-powerful-indeed X-Men while their creators struggled to provide evidence that the team as a whole were still really quite put-upon; Sentinels on the Mansion lawn, "No more mutants", unfriendly fellow superpeople teams, a whole smorgasbord of unconvincing Mcguffins to help the audience identify with Xavier's now exceedingly commanding mutants.

In fact, it all got to the point in the mid-Nineties where it was quite understandable, if not condonable, that such a large percentage of Marvel-America should be concerned about this mass of exceedingly fearsome mutants constantly blowing up people, buildings, space stations, alternative realities, planets, suns and Lord knows what else.

And here I am talking about the X-Men, and not any Brotherhood of Evil Mutants at all.


4.

But the final death rattle for the X-Men as a distinct and purposeful metaphor for any individual or group without power finally arrived, after decades of poorly-thought-through stories, with the usually excellent Matt Fraction's otherwise interesting "X-Nation", where the X-Men stood revealed not as an oppressed minority at all, but as the unpleasant lords of a super-powered state. The jocks and the geeks of the mutant world now all stood together on a hunk of rock outside San Francisco, displaying once more how Marvel-USA doesn't share the same laws with our world's America, or else the phrase "territorial waters" might count for more. And with this substantial army of super-powered characters parked unfeasibly free of America's authority, and yet close enough to San Francisco to pop over without passports for a burger and a shimmy in the local fleshpots, the X-Men completed their transformation from the powerless to the powerful, from the oppressed to the oppressor.

For oppressors they undoubtedly were. There were, for example, illegal holding cells far below the surface of Asteroid M/Utopia where the X-Men, or rather a few of their number, held what they regarded as undesirables without reference to any court. And Cyclops was now just another fascist bully quite literally torturing his victims in the name of saving lives, and, most unforgivably, the X-Family now contained an assassination squad, the appalling conceit of "X-Force". The bullied had become the bullies, and if it could be argued that that's what so often happens in political terms to nations who suffer awful oppression, the extension of the stories into this particular metaphor destroyed the myth of the X-Men as a symbol of the huddled masses and the wretched refuse. They were the elite autocratic rulers of a superhero nation, a mass of dangerous and fractious individuals who ruled without care for the political process. After all, Cyclops doesn't seem to be democratically elected, or to pay any attention to the concept of democracy, or indeed, the ideals and practise of the rule of law, considering those minor matters of torture, false imprisonment, and assassination which don't seem to weigh too heavily on his conscience at all.

5.

I'm somewhat staggered that Cyclops at the very least isn't regarded as a toxic character by readers, so conceptually-radioactive with his own moral corruption that everyone clamors for his perpetual imprisonment in a fictional American jail. Similarly, I can't believe that X-Force is allowed to function by the editorial offices of Marvel, but then, if superheroes can do anything and still be super heroes, well, what does anything matter? Everything's fun, nothing's serious, torture and murder serve as marks of heroic necessity, and I suppose that it's now empowering for us to see our heroes escape entirely from either legal or moral constraints, with only the odd debate between Storm and Wolverine at funerals to indicate that Scott Summer's secret state is in any way a contentious business.

In fact, I feel such a measure of despair writing this, such a sense of being a Jonah, in both the Biblical as well as the naval sense, that I can't help but feel that there's no place for me as a consumer of this medium at all.

For it's one thing to be so careless with the fundamental metaphor underlining a book that it comes quite adrift from it. But it's another to turn our heroes into beasts and then peddle them as virtuously pragmatic role models.

6.

The solution to the problem of the all-too-powerful X-Men is dealt with in a sadly-temporary but effective way in "X-Men" # 3, namely, they're provided with an opponent that can be seen to be a match, and perhaps even more than a match, for them. It's been a task that's tested Marvel's creators on and off for decades now, and pulling off the whole matter of convincingly threatening the X-Men remains a challenge for writer Victor Gischeer here, as it would be for any scribe given the team's current firepower. (Why, even Prince Namor quite unbelievably takes orders from Mr Summers now, albeit with poor grace, and lives in the ocean beneath "Utopia", as if he were a senior butler with a fine apartment out behind some stately home.) Yet there is something of a credibly overwhelming threat on offer from the vampires, and it's made more plausible by the not-unexpected twist that key members of the X-Men are being infected with that Type-Bite-Me vampire blood. (It will not shock those who've not read the book yet that Wolverine is yet again one of those who's apparently switched camps to that of the toothy ones.)

Several armies of vampire, therefore, is the simple solution to the problem of the X-Men being nobodies victim anymore, though it isn't one which is likely to work again. The X-Men can't permanently become a book about Scott Summer's women and men and their fight against overwhelming numbers of alien forces. And so, until "Utopia" with its super-powered citizenry, and its black ops organisation, is dismantled, or sanctified by law and a renouncement of terrorism, that wonderful sense of the powerless against the powerful is going to be largely absent from the franchises pages.

7.

I have to confess to feeling somewhat cheated by Mr Gischeler's script for X-Men # 3, since it stands as surely the most sparse set of words that I've seen within the covers of a comic book for a very long time. Even with the generally-followed and dogmatic abandonment of the narrative caption, there were surely still options to the leaving of often-unremarkable panels quite bare of information. And I think that the fact that text is information and part of the experience of enriching the reading of comic-book is becoming forgotten. Though I've never been an advocate of returning to the excesses of Claremontism, "Curse Of The Mutants:Part 3" is so parsimonious with its dialogue that it feels as if a good two-thirds of the word balloons simply fell off the page between computer and printer, if such were possible. Certainly, letterer Joe Caramagna wasn't up at 3am finishing this job off, unless somebody really messed up the scheduling. To take but a few examples, the appearance of Namor bearing Dracula's head is dealt with in two panels and 16 words, though these two panels and 16 words still manage to take up two-thirds of a page. My god, what most writers would give to have a chance to bring that scene to life, but here it's reduced to;

Panel 1

Namor:- (Holds out Dracula's severed head.) "I believe you sent me to retrieve this dubious item."

Panel 2.

Namor: "I can't stay. Much has happened."
Cyclops: "I understand."


Well, I don't know what had happened, and I don't understand, and even if the editorial fiat had declared that readers mustn't be filled in so that they'll be driven to the relevant crossover, something emotional and moving could have been added there. For it's absolutely obvious that Mr Gischler can write and write effectively; but there's a difference between a creator reigning in his indulgences and a writer choosing not to provide his audience with the richest possible reading experience short of unacceptably cluttering up the page. Between himself and equally able Paco Medina, I can't but feel that we might have been offered a more dense and engaging reading experience than is on show here. We certainly might have been offered a story that gave us something more substantial than three unnecessary splash pages and two more which were as close to storyless pin-ups as could be constructed.


8.

I. I do hope that Wolverine's apparent defection to the vampire's cause doesn't turn out to have been part of some grand plan by Cyclops, another mark of how morally-righteous he is even in his deception of all and sundry. Just an issue or two of the X-Men taking their lumps and having to find their way in a world not defined by their overwhelming power would be enjoyable.

For no matter how the writers of the past decade or two have tried to ignore this particular elephant in this specific room, the fact remains that the X-Men and their fellow mutants are appallingly powerful and as a consequence should surely be exceedingly effective in getting their way.

But they're victims still, aren't they? With their own island, and undersea annex, with Namor and Blade and how on Earth is anybody convinced that these characters are victims of anything beyond some very dodgy tailoring?


II. Still, at least the X-Men are seriously outnumbered here. They may not all be heroes, or innocents, or even particularly pleasant, and the adventure itself is at best diverting and hardly riveting, but there's enough of the old loser-metaphor beginning to surface to allow some sympathy to percolate to the mutant's side, if only because a few however-many thousand vampires are even lower on the moral totem pole that Scott Summers and his secret-state-within-a-costumed-state are.

And perhaps a touch of humility might return to the X-Men's pages as a consequence of the experience, because the X-Men as they stand, or at least as they've been portrayed in all the recent books I've encountered them in, currently make most unconvincing put-upon heroes, as well as a rather repellent terrorist superhero organisation too.

9.

But I do remember a different X-Men. And of course I remember Cyclops too. He used to wear heavily-framed glasses and find it hard to talk to girls, and he was a good man.


This was perhaps the last "I Know Nothing" piece for a little while. I hope the day has found you well, and I wish you a splendid tomorrow! No, really, I do. This is a cynic-free portion of the blogosphere and it's been nice to see you here.

.
More about →

Some Thoughts On Matt Fraction & "Nation-X" part 1 of 1 (!): Some Fantastic Place No 6:

Người đăng: Unknown on Chủ Nhật, 6 tháng 6, 2010

1. For New-ish Readers: What's This "Some Fantastic Place"?

I. It's been something of an intense few weeks on this blog. I know I'm trying to teach myself to write to tight and demanding deadlines, but perhaps everyone might benefit from something of a lighter touch today. It's time, I think, to attend to the business of remembering how comic books are so often fun. And not "also fun", or "just fun", or "simple fun", but fun-fun. And being relentlessly and quite honestly positive about the enjoyable aspects of comic books is just what the "Some Fantastic Place" pieces here on this blog have always been about. So, why not take a reviving and super-hero friendly wander with your host here through Matt Fraction's stories in the "Nation-X" hardcover released just this past week in the UK?

II. If you're new around these parts, the following is a quote from a previous blog which should give you some idea of what to expect from these "Some Fantastic Place" pieces here at TooBusyThinkingAboutMyComics;

"It's really tough working out how good a comic is. So this time, let's not bother. Let's take a more relaxed and emotional path to evaluation. Let's do away with all pretense at intellectual analysis and abandon all critical thought, fanboy indignation and continuity cop-ness. Let's just start looking for good things. Little good things, perhaps, just tiny nuggets of fun. Imaginative single panels, witty snatches of dialogue, unexpectedly appropriate sound effects. All the things we would have noticed and treasured when we had far less comic books to indulge in and far more time on our hands."

Pleasing Moments no. 1: Form And Content And Claremontisms

I. It's genuinely touching how often and how precisely Matt Fraction channels his inner Chris Claremont in the stories collected in "X-Nation". Or, at least, I presume that's what Mr Fraction is doing. For his dialogue here is often more formal and more deliberately prosaic than in, for example, his contemporaneous Iron Man scripts. And it does seems reasonable to suggest that Mr Fraction is in this way tipping his hat to the modern X-Men's most influential creator, or, perhaps, that Mr Fraction has at one time or another read so much of Mr Claremont's work that the latter's voice has indelibly imprinted itself on whichever part of the Fraction right cerebral cortex is being used for the writing of the X-Men.

If it is the latter situation, then I know how Mr Fraction feels. When he has Professor Xavier declare "Emma, I love Scott like he was my own son." (519:18:4, see above) in that familiar Claremontian manner, it hits with a nostalgic rush that hauls me back to the early 1980's. I'm at university, I'm taking the Greyhound across America, I'm working in soft drinks warehouses and paint factories, and all the time, once or twice a month, there's Chris Claremont's "X-men" as part of the everyday landscape of the time.



II. Or those apparent Claremontisms might be the result of the decision made to, bar a few character-identifying captions, present all the non-visual information in the Nation-X stories in the form of word balloons. This extreme example of post-Bendis narrative orthodoxy leads to the need to explain some exceedingly complex comic-book concepts in the form of conversations. Here's one of my favourites, as Psylocke and Iceman prepare to fight off a giant sea monster ("Dark Reign: The List - X-men 112:2, see above):

psy: "This may not work, Bobby -- I'm still not quite used to this power set. But I believe if you open yourself up to me I should be able to amplify your abilities. Just relax into your thoughts and feelings ... "

ice: "Believe me, emotional transparency has never been one of my issues ... "

Well, those sentences may not have been composed entirely of language redolent of the '80's, but if those Shooteresque info-dumps don't take you back, then you either weren't there or you weren't reading closely enough. And for a while, reading the "X-Men" damn closely was more than a four-colour pleasure. It was an act of faith. And in the rituals of that faith, now as well as several decades ago, opaque and wonderfully "Wah? Huh?" Claremontisms, such as Psylocke's declaration that an opponent is so dangerous that "Even her thoughts become transparent ... " (521:4:3), become as pleasurable and comforting as the catechism must have been to believers when intoned in Latin.

Pleasing Moments no. 2: Before The Claws Are Popped

I do worry about the no-narrative captions rule in these X-Men issues, but there are undoubtedly moments when the inability to eavesdrop on a character's thoughts throws the responsibility of figuring out what's going on back productively to the reader. Consider the scene in the X-Men's Blackbird (520:1:4, above) where we see Colossus, Psylocke and Wolverine on their way to a real big punch-up in New York City. Artist Greg Land's composition is an effective one, concentrating on showing how each of the characters portrayed are lost in their own thoughts, as you'd expect during a long flight on a dangerous mission. And with no extra information except for the highly effective colouring by Justin Ponsor, who grounds the reader in the understanding through his choice of a narrow range of reds and purple that it's night-time and there's a great deal of impressive electronic machinery around, it's up to us to work out what everyone's thinking. There are no other clues at hand. So, I found myself wondering why Colossus was armoured up. Wouldn't that make the Blackbird's travel-time considerably slower? Is he worried about the battle to come, or perhaps nervous about all the times the Blackbird's been blown up while he's on it, a tradition going back to the New X-Men's second appearance? Or is it a reflection of his inability to suppress his rage and loneliness since Kitty Pryde has been lost to him?

Well, I don't know, anymore than I can guess what Psylocke's thinking of while looking so alluring in the front seat. But I distrust my ability to interpret that expression even more than I do my analysis of Colossus.


And Wolverine? Well, I don't think he's bothered by very much at all. Battles, dangerous foes, transcontinental supersonic flight? He's just not concerned. Which is, of course, absolutely appropriate.

Pleasing Moments no. 3: I Think We'll Need More Than A Flow Chart Here

I. There are nine individual issues written by Mr Fraction in the "Nation-X" collection, and within those pages there are, not counting the odd background character with a stray "Wha..?" to offer, 47 speaking roles, as well as Marrina the sea-monster too, bless her. And then there are 30 informing captions giving the readers basic information about leading characters and their roles and powers, including several for younger mutants whom Rogue absorbs the powers of that we never hear speak at all.

II. When the control of a major American mainstream comic-book publisher falls into my oh-so-worthy hands, I will be undoubtedly hiring Mr Fraction to write the lead book of whatever the most crowded and continuity-heavy franchise my company owns the rights to is. For there's no point complaining that "X-Nation" has too many characters and too many plot-lines, though for a reader such as myself who's well out of the mutant-adventure loop, it certainly can feel that way at times. But that's not what the "X-Men" book is concerned with. To complain about it being crowded is to moan that Matter-Eating Lad keeps eating stuff. It's a redundant criticism. And here, in addition to the usual hectic and chock-a-bloc business of Marvel's X-Universe, Mr Fraction also has to make sure that his book supports the status quo of "Dark Reign", while taking advantage of the opportunities that line-wide crossover offers too. On top of that, there's 13 mutants or supporting players which, to a greater or lesser extent, have their own character arcs played out across these issues too. And it ought to be said that it's all done pretty much effectively, and though there's a little playing clever, hard and fast with key plot-developments in places, the surprise is that with so much in the air to juggle, so much gets done, and so little gets dropped.

III. An minor but telling example of this attention to detail while attending to the major story arcs, both self-generated and company-imposed, can be found at N-X:9:2, where the power-redundancies within the huge cast of mutants on what was once Asteroid-X is embraced rather than skated over. With a substantial number of Prince Namor's subjects to move out of harm's way, two X-Men from different eras with overlapping power-sets are put to work together to get the job done. It shows an attention to detail which some other writers might not possess, to have both Magik and Pixie doing effectively the same thing at the same time, and the scene certainly helps to neuter any criticism that there's no point having characters with such similar abilities in the X-Universe. But of course there's a "need". There's nothing to be gained by killing off one of the teleporters just because there's a second jaunter around. How can the X-Men teleport entire populations of under-sea people right across the globe without having at least two teleporters at hand?

"Ipso fatso", as the Perishers used to declare.

Pleasing Moments no. 4: The Undersea Alan Davis

In the panels above, Alan Davis and Mark Farmer achieve what generations of artists have mostly failed to. They produce a vision of undersea life in a superhero universe that doesn't look as if one form or another of a surface city has simply been dropped pretty-much-whole onto a sandy beach on an ocean floor. Those oh-so-deceptively simple buildings in N-X:3:1 appear both familiar and alien, the light from their mostly-silhouetted forms reminding us how dark it must be at the bottom of the South China Sea, and how fundamental those structures must be to the survival of their inhabitants. And then in n-x:3:2, Mr Davis again breaks with the standard-model representation of life under the ocean waves. Look, people are floating as they harvest the crops, their bodies shifting to allow them to balance where they are. Nobody is standing, or seeming to levitate, or swimming in a non-descript fashion. Finally, in X-N/3:3, we're shown three of the aquatic farmers and they're each distinct from each other. There's a very young boy, a clearly older tattooed man, and a woman whose age can be pegged between the two. They're not dressed in identikit "under-the-sea" clothes, they each display variations on a common appearance, and consequently their slaughter by Marrina carries far more weight than such a plot-furthering, people-slaughtering scene normally would.

DC really missed an opportunity when they bumped Mr Davis up from drawing "Aquaman" to "Batman" in '80's. He was a fine Batman artist, with and without the Outsiders in tow, but it was Aquaman that was in need, and probably still is now too.

Pleasing Moments no. 5: Explaining The Impossible To The Unbeliever

There are peculiarly sublime and ridiculous moments particular to long-standing comic book universes, the beauty of which would be impossible to explain to anybody who isn't already a years-long convert to the "realities" of a superhero world. Consider the panel shown above, from the climax of the "Nation-X" one-shot at at N-X:20/21. By the time the neophyte has had it explained to them, for example, who Namor is, and who Marrina is, and how the latter had been corrupted by Norman Osbourne, and how the marriage between Prince of Atlantis and Alpha Flight stalwart had developed and been destroyed, and what "Dark Reign" was, and who the Sentry is ..... well, once anybody outside this particular loop was fully informed of what they need to know to make sense of the scene, they'd be so stunned and perhaps alienated by information overload that there'd be little chance they'd enjoy the scene at all. In fact, they'd probably need a stiff drink just to rid themselves of the suspicion that at least one other person in their life was constantly processing all this arcane stuff around in their heads when they should be, for example, considering their tax-returns, or Sunday lunch.

Suffice to say, I haven't attempted to explain to the Splendid Wife why I laughed so with delight at the scene where Namor threw the huge monstrous head of his poor dead wife through the side of an Oscorp building at Norman Osbourn. I'm certain to never try to illuminate why it's so fun and knowing that such a huge missile propelled by a single flying man should have managed to pin its' target to the floor without doing any significant damage to Osbourn at all.

It's absurd, it's splendid, it's funny as hell, and it's chilling too. In fact, it's the disturbing undertones of it which stayed with this reader the longest. If any of us can't enjoy that scene, then perhaps something of our super-hero comic-book heart has grown cold.

Pleasing Moments no. 6: Protecting The Powerless Is What Super-Heroes Do

And finally the last tip of the head, the last indulgence of this palate-cleansing exercise, takes us to the scene of mutant non-combatants being sheparded to safety at 516:20:2. One of the least-often portrayed functions of the super-hero is the responsibility for "protecting the innocent". Truth be told, I'd usually far more prefer to watch our costumed heroes help scared and confused bystanders towards safety than to watch yet another building getting dropped on yet another costume. There's something so comforting and charming about seeing those with power acting to help those without, and it just isn't done enough. As I know I've said before, our super-heroes will always be, for most of us, those bright and strong figures who would have stood between us and those who bullied us if only they'd have known that we needed their help. Deep in our hearts, we want to believe that we might whisper the name of our favourite cape'n'coloured-booty character when things are at their worst and they'll appear, dragging the X-Men or whoever behind them. To save the day.

Or is that just me? I don't think so.

Result: I enjoyed it all. I always do. I wouldn't write about a comic-book in a "Some Fantastic Place" if there weren't good things to be talked about within its' covers. "Nation-X" was a fine confection to get lost in of a Saturday afternoon while the sun was untypically seasonally high and hot, the Splendid Wife showing Splendid Folks round the garden, and England winning at the cricket. Huzzah!


Coming soon: A Letter To Dalgoda, Golden Age Super-hero Origins As Fairy-Stories, Curt Swan's control of vanishing lines, or something else entirely if the previous ideas don't work out. I wish you a splendid day! Do take care an'stuff.



.
More about →